Bug 236488

Summary: Review Request: aimject - AIM packet injection tool
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Joe Rozner <livinded>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: John Mahowald <jpmahowald>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: mail
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-12-31 09:53:28 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Joe Rozner 2007-04-15 01:49:31 EDT
I'm still looking for a sponsor so that I may become a contributor though this isn't my first package.
Spec URL: http://deadbytes.net/packages/fedora/specs/aimject/aimject.spec
SRPM URL: <http://deadbytes.net/packages/fedora/srpms/aimject-1.0-1.src.rpm
Description:
Aimject facilitates man-in-the-middle attacks against AOL Instant Messenger's
OSCAR protocol via a simple GTK interface.

FEATURES

  * sign-on/off detection
  * message interception/decoding
  * message injection into arbitrary conversations
    * synchronization of AIM sequence numbers and fnac ids
    * cloning of font styles/screenname formatting to avoid detection
  * selective muting of conversation participants
  * session statistics
  * integrated ARP/DNS spoofing
Comment 1 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-05-25 14:20:21 EDT
It seems that you are now sponsored (bug 232855)?
Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-06-09 13:30:58 EDT
Removing needsponsor
Comment 3 John Mahowald 2007-09-27 11:01:05 EDT
Builds fine.

However, you do need to specify GPL version now, as per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing   Looks like 2 and later, from a source
file.

Remove the Requires: gtk2  as rpm can figure that out.
Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-12-19 09:30:19 EST
What is the status of this bug?
Comment 5 Joe Rozner 2007-12-20 12:32:54 EST
Oh, I thought this had been closed a long time ago. I'll see if I can get this
fixed up today after work and get it committed, otherwise I'll make sure I do it
tomorrow.
Comment 6 Joe Rozner 2007-12-22 19:42:30 EST
The same issue still exists with the application not actually working. I had a
lengthy conversation with the author a few months back in an attempt to fix the
issues and it led nowhere.
Comment 7 Rakesh Pandit 2008-09-03 10:35:36 EDT
@Joe
It seems this ticket needs to be closed. Are you still interested.
If no info is provided soon it will be closed.