Bug 236488

Summary:	Review Request: aimject - AIM packet injection tool
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Joe Rozner <livinded>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	John Mahowald <jpmahowald>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	mail
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-12-31 09:53:28 EST	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	201449

Description Joe Rozner 2007-04-15 01:49:31 EDT

I'm still looking for a sponsor so that I may become a contributor though this isn't my first package.
Spec URL: http://deadbytes.net/packages/fedora/specs/aimject/aimject.spec
SRPM URL: <http://deadbytes.net/packages/fedora/srpms/aimject-1.0-1.src.rpm
Description:
Aimject facilitates man-in-the-middle attacks against AOL Instant Messenger's
OSCAR protocol via a simple GTK interface.

FEATURES

  * sign-on/off detection
  * message interception/decoding
  * message injection into arbitrary conversations
    * synchronization of AIM sequence numbers and fnac ids
    * cloning of font styles/screenname formatting to avoid detection
  * selective muting of conversation participants
  * session statistics
  * integrated ARP/DNS spoofing

Comment 1 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-05-25 14:20:21 EDT

It seems that you are now sponsored (bug 232855)?

Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-06-09 13:30:58 EDT

Removing needsponsor

Comment 3 John Mahowald 2007-09-27 11:01:05 EDT

Builds fine.

However, you do need to specify GPL version now, as per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing   Looks like 2 and later, from a source
file.

Remove the Requires: gtk2  as rpm can figure that out.

Comment 4 Mamoru TASAKA 2007-12-19 09:30:19 EST

What is the status of this bug?

Comment 5 Joe Rozner 2007-12-20 12:32:54 EST

Oh, I thought this had been closed a long time ago. I'll see if I can get this
fixed up today after work and get it committed, otherwise I'll make sure I do it
tomorrow.

Comment 6 Joe Rozner 2007-12-22 19:42:30 EST

The same issue still exists with the application not actually working. I had a
lengthy conversation with the author a few months back in an attempt to fix the
issues and it led nowhere.

Comment 7 Rakesh Pandit 2008-09-03 10:35:36 EDT

@Joe
It seems this ticket needs to be closed. Are you still interested.
If no info is provided soon it will be closed.