Bug 236491

The package looks good. I'll take the reviewer.

However rpmlint spits:
chitlesh(SPECS)
[2]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ruby-romkan-0.4-1.src.rpm
W: ruby-romkan strange-permission ruby-romkan.spec 0600
W: ruby-romkan strange-permission ruby-romkan-0.4.tar.gz 0600
W: ruby-romkan mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 1)

MUST Items:

- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license 
and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license 
Ruby(GPL).
- MUST: The spec file is written in American English.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream 
source, as provided in the spec URL.
- MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least i386.
- MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires.
- MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable
- MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files 
listing.
- MUST: Permissions on files are set properly.
- MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} 
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
- MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros 
section
of Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described 
in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: There are no Large documentation files
- MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If 
it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present.
- MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix 
- MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other 
packages. 

SHOULD Items:

 - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386.
 - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A
package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
 - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. 
 - SHOULD: No subpackages present.

APPROVED!

Please fix the rpmlint issues as said in Comment #2.

Thank you!

(In reply to comment #1)
> However rpmlint spits:
> chitlesh(SPECS)
> [2]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ruby-romkan-0.4-1.src.rpm
> W: ruby-romkan strange-permission ruby-romkan.spec 0600
> W: ruby-romkan strange-permission ruby-romkan-0.4.tar.gz 0600
> W: ruby-romkan mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 1)

Ah.. I uploaded the spec/srpm at the time I didn't fix these...

http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ruby-romkan.spec
http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ruby-romkan-0.4-2.fc7.src.rpm

Request for CVS admin:
--------------------------------------------------------------
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name:           ruby-romkan
Short Description:      Romaji <-> Kana conversion library for Ruby
Owners:                 mtasaka.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Branches:               devel FC-6 FC-5
InitialCC:              (nobody)
---------------------------------------------------------------

Rebuilt for all branches, closing.
Thank you for reviewing and approving this package!!

P.S.
I would appreciate it if you would review the last one,
migemo itself (bug 236493).