Bug 2366189

Summary:	Review Request: rubygem-drb - Distributed object system for Ruby
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Benson Muite <benson_muite>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	NEW ---	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	package-review, vondruch
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Linux
URL:	https://github.com/ruby/drb
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	---
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Benson Muite 2025-05-14 07:59:17 UTC

spec: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-drb.spec
srpm: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-drb-2.2.1-1.fc41~bootstrap.src.rpm

description:
Distributed object system for Ruby.

fas:
fed500

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-05-14 08:05:10 UTC

Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9035638
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2366189-rubygem-drb/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09035638-rubygem-drb/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Vít Ondruch 2025-10-03 15:24:17 UTC

I wonder what is the reason to package this as an independent package. This is still provided by Ruby package as part of ruby-bundled-gems subpackage. IOW in Fedora, it is enough to specify `Requires: rubygem(drb)`, but typically, dependency generators takes care about this.