Bug 2366199

Summary: openldap-epel 2.6.8-4.el9 needed in EPEL 9
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Alex Iribarren <alex.iribarren>
Component: openldap-epelAssignee: Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel9CC: djuarezg, jansen, mattias.ellert, steve.traylen, trevor.hemsley
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: openldap-epel-2.6.8-2.el9 Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-05-28 01:55:03 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Alex Iribarren 2025-05-14 08:45:18 UTC
Now that RHEL 9.6 has been released, openldap-epel 2.6.8-4.el9 needs to move from EPEL 9 Next to EPEL 9. Can you please trigger this?

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2025-05-19 09:17:05 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7a7ef11dc0 (openldap-epel-2.6.8-2.el9) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7a7ef11dc0

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2025-05-20 02:22:04 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7a7ef11dc0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7a7ef11dc0

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2025-05-28 01:55:03 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7a7ef11dc0 (openldap-epel-2.6.8-2.el9) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 5 Trevor Hemsley 2025-06-04 17:49:03 UTC
This bugzilla is not complete. It reports that it needs to be updated to 2.6.8-4.el9 but is then closed saying it's fixed in openldap-epel-2.6.8-2.el9.

Comment 6 Trevor Hemsley 2025-06-04 17:53:18 UTC
Hmm, my bad, it installs just fine and no longer cares about the minor version number difference of -2.el9 vs -4.el9