Bug 236827
Summary: | ricci uninstallable on ppc | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Cluster Suite | Reporter: | Nate Straz <nstraz> |
Component: | conga | Assignee: | Ryan McCabe <rmccabe> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Corey Marthaler <cmarthal> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4 | CC: | cfeist, cluster-maint, kanderso, kupcevic, rmccabe |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | powerpc | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 4.5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-08-09 22:30:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Nate Straz
2007-04-17 20:33:35 UTC
Need this in 4.5 release. QE has machines to use for figuring the problem out. Nate will provide machine name. I think this is a bug in the dependency resolver (or something in that area): [root@kent ~]# up2date --whatprovides="libmagic.so.1" file-4.10-3.EL4.5.ppc [root@kent ~]# up2date --whatprovides="libmagic.so.1()(64bit)" [root@kent ~]# Other 64-bit libraries that ricci needs are accounted for correctly e.g., [root@kent ~]# up2date --whatprovides="libcrypto.so.4()(64bit)" openssl-0.9.7a-43.16.ppc64 If I manually install the ppc64 "file" package (file-4.10-3.EL4.5.ppc64.rpm), I'm able to run up2date successfully, and I get this output from rpm: [root@newport SPECS]# rpm -q --provides file-4.10-3.EL4.5.ppc64 libmagic.so.1()(64bit) file = 4.10-3.EL4.5 Is there someone around who's more familiar with the build system who might know how to go about getting this fixed? Closing as NOTABUG--we're going to build 32-bit. 64-bit packages aren't supported. It's still a bug that we don't have ppc packages that install. We need to be able track that this problem is fixed. I don't see how this could possibly be NOTABUG. In the 0.9.1-8 build, the ppc64 arch is excluded. This should adequately work around the problem, provided that the right bits make it to RHN. |