Bug 2370613
| Summary: | Please branch and build pax-utils in epel10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Christophe Piault <cqb> |
| Component: | pax-utils | Assignee: | Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel10 | CC: | dominik |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | pax-utils-1.3.8-2.el10_1 | Doc Type: | --- |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-06-16 00:32:58 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Christophe Piault
2025-06-06 09:42:40 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0990281a5c (pax-utils-1.3.8-2.el10_1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0990281a5c Would you be interested in becoming a co-maintainer to the package? FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0990281a5c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0990281a5c See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #2) > Would you be interested in becoming a co-maintainer to the package? Sorry my workload does not allow me to become a co-maintainer for this package. But I can do some testing as here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-cc54cfc32f FEDORA-EPEL-2025-0990281a5c (pax-utils-1.3.8-2.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |