Bug 2372674
| Summary: | Review Request: smbldap-tools – Samba/LDAP account management tools (revived for EPEL9) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Akiyoshi Kurita <akito5623> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel9 | CC: | carl, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | --- | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-06-19 17:24:10 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Akiyoshi Kurita
2025-06-13 12:33:54 UTC
The ticket summary is not in the correct format.
Expected:
Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here>
Found:
Review Request: smbldap-tools – Samba/LDAP account management tools (revived for EPEL9)
As a consequence, the package name cannot be parsed and submitted to
be automatically build. Please modify the ticket summary and trigger a
build by typing [fedora-review-service-build].
---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
There are no known active CVEs related to smbldap-tools as of June 2025. While upstream is inactive, the tool remains functionally useful in production systems—especially for legacy Samba + LDAP deployments in EL-based environments (e.g., AlmaLinux, Rocky). We are using it internally and have confirmed expected behavior. If upstream remains inactive, I am willing to maintain the package within EPEL. [fedora-review-service-build] There are no known active CVEs related to Amanda as of June 2025. The software is still in use in some educational and research environments as a backup solution. This package has been rebuilt and tested for EPEL10 (AlmaLinux 10), and we are using it internally. I am willing to maintain the package within EPEL if upstream remains inactive. Correction: Comment 4 contains Amanda-related information and was posted here by mistake. Please disregard it. NOTE: This package depends on `perl-Crypt-SmbHash`, which has been submitted separately for review as Bug #2372XXX. Please see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2372XXX This Perl module is required for password management functionality (e.g., smbldap-passwd), and should be reviewed together with smbldap-tools. NOTE: This package depends on `perl-Crypt-SmbHash`, which is under review in Bug #2372951: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2372951 This Perl module provides the required LAN Manager and NT hash functions used in tools such as `smbldap-passwd`. Both packages are intended to be reviewed together, as `smbldap-tools` will not function correctly without this dependency. To Bugzilla Admin: Please delete the following comments from this ticket to avoid confusion: - Comment 4: This contains incorrect content related to Amanda and was posted in error. - Comment 6: This includes an invalid placeholder Bug ID before the correct dependency (Bug #2372951) was assigned. The correct information is already provided in Comment 5 and Comment 7 respectively. Thank you for your help. Package reviews are not the correct way to request Fedora packages be added to EPEL. You've already been provided instructions for how to do this properly in several other locations. Please take the time to read those instructions and stop excessively replying with AI-generated nonsense. |