Bug 2372942
Summary: | Review Request: opendmarc – Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC) milter | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | redadmin-k <akito5623> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | benson_muite, carl, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | --- | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2025-06-19 17:34:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
redadmin-k
2025-06-16 02:57:16 UTC
The package is already in Fedora: https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/opendmarc/opendmarc/ and is built for EPEL8 and EPEL9. Contact the package maintainers to request building it for EPEL10. You can probably make a pull request at: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/opendmarc The maintainers might appreciate assistance maintaining the package, see: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-maintainers/#joining_the_epel_package_maintainers Please build opendmarc for EPEL10. This package is required for our production environment. If help is needed for maintenance, I am willing to join as a co-maintainer. Hi Akito, 1) Fork https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/opendmarc 2) Clone your fork 3) Make a branch in your fork, say readadmin-k-epel-10 4) Add your spec file to the branch in your fork 5) Push from your fork 6) Then make a pull request to https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/opendmarc *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2344510 *** |