Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Review Request: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 -- Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 support|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Wes Hardaker <wjhns174>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Jason Tibbitts <tibbs>|
|Status:||CLOSED NEXTRELEASE||QA Contact:||Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2007-05-31 19:11:18 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Wes Hardaker 2007-04-20 16:37:14 EDT
Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509.spec Description: A Perl wrapper around OpenSSL's X509 library. (I don't currently have a sponsor, although there are other packages I've submitted as well tagged as needing a sponsor as well).
Comment 1 Wes Hardaker 2007-04-30 18:14:03 EDT
Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-0.4-1.src.rpm fixed srpm url.
Comment 2 Wes Hardaker 2007-05-08 16:59:08 EDT
Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-0.4-2.src.rpm - Add BuildRequire openssl-devel - Don't manually require openssl - Use vendorarch instead of vendorlib
Comment 3 Wes Hardaker 2007-05-14 20:38:12 EDT
Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-0.4-3.src.rpm - BuildRequire perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) - Fixed source code URL
Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2007-05-26 17:18:04 EDT
Not much to say here; everything looks good. The only oddify is this: Checking if your kit is complete... Warning: the following files are missing in your kit: inc inc/Module inc/Module/Install Please inform the author. Except that those are actually there, as directories. I don't think directories are supposed to be listed separately in the manifest but I'm not really certain. Perhaps it's worth passing that on to upstream. * source files match upstream: a10433ff68b70687bac6832d5814db730147d3dc0cbf3e61c08a0711851c879e Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-0.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). * package installs properly * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: X509.so()(64bit) perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::X509) = 0.4 perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 = 0.4-3.fc7 = libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Exporter) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=10, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.07 cusr + 0.03 csys = 0.10 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la droppings. APPROVED
Comment 5 Wes Hardaker 2007-05-31 17:52:30 EDT
FYI, upstream notified.
Comment 6 Wes Hardaker 2007-05-31 17:54:58 EDT
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 Short Description: Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 Support Owners: email@example.com Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC:
Comment 7 Jason Tibbitts 2007-05-31 19:03:16 EDT
CVS done. It may take a bit before Koji is syncronized.
Comment 8 Steve Traylen 2010-01-29 09:33:27 EST
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: stevetraylen InitialCC: perl-sig I contacted the package owner over a week requesting the addition of perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 to EPEL without response. I would now like to maintain this within EPEL. Steve
Comment 9 Wes Hardaker 2010-01-29 16:21:40 EST
I've been swamped for the last week, sorry... I'd be fine with you taking on the development for EPEL if you like though.
Comment 10 R P Herrold 2010-01-29 17:19:02 EST
This looks like it went into EPEL some time ago ex Fedora /mnt/nfs/var/ftp/pub/mirror/redhat/rhel/epel/pub/fedora/linux/development/source/SRPMS/perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-0.4-3.fc8.src.rpm [herrold@centos-5 perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509]$ perl-rpmbuild --rebuild perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509-0.4-3.fc8.src.rpm warning: user kojibuilder does not exist - using root warning: group kojibuilder does not exist - using root warning: user kojibuilder does not exist - using root warning: group kojibuilder does not exist - using root [herrold@centos-5 perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509]$ still builds on centos 5 what is the issue? was it orphaned out/
Comment 11 Wes Hardaker 2010-01-29 18:47:46 EST
There are simply no build directories for it. We need something like this done: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 Short Description: Perl OpenSSL bindings for X509 Support Owners: firstname.lastname@example.org Branches: EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: I think we need a new bug request for it; sigh... my memory of fedora create-a-new-branch methodology fails me after not having done it for a year (as always).
Comment 12 Steve Traylen 2010-01-30 14:29:57 EST
Don't really understand the history here , for me today its certainly not in EPEL. If you can maintain in EPEL that would be great. I think you want a Package change request rather than new. In fact exactly the same as what I have in Comment #8 with your user name. To avoid confusion I will switch the fedora-cvs flag on this bug back to +. Once you have package change request in then change it to ? for them to process. Thanks again for offering to maintain in EPEL. Very useful. Steve
Comment 13 Steve Traylen 2010-02-13 15:13:10 EST
Hi Wes, Can you make the package request and maintain the package? Else I will :-) Steve
Comment 14 Wes Hardaker 2010-02-16 09:27:50 EST
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
Comment 15 Wes Hardaker 2010-02-16 09:29:24 EST
FYI according to the docs the flag needed to be set to ? not + to get it to show up in their queue.
Comment 16 Jason Tibbitts 2010-02-16 10:15:50 EST
Also note that Owners needs to have Fedora account names, not email addresses. Could you submit a corrected request?
Comment 17 Wes Hardaker 2010-02-16 13:24:03 EST
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: hardaker
Comment 18 Jason Tibbitts 2010-02-19 13:31:46 EST
Comment 19 Wes Hardaker 2014-09-16 20:11:04 EDT
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-X509 New Branches: epel7 Owners: hardaker Need to port this package to el7
Comment 20 Jens Petersen 2014-09-17 02:49:25 EDT
Git done (by process-git-requests). no perl-sig CC?