Bug 2374177
| Summary: | Please branch and build cairomm for EPEL 10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | wojnilowicz <lukasz.wojnilowicz> |
| Component: | cairomm | Assignee: | Ben Beasley <code> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | code, kalevlember |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | cairomm-1.14.5-10.el10_1 | Doc Type: | --- |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-07-23 00:24:52 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2315461, 2374176 | ||
|
Description
wojnilowicz
2025-06-21 19:18:53 UTC
Can you please confirm whether you need https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cairomm or https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cairomm1.16 ? I could branch cairomm1.16 now; if cairomm is indeed what you need, then libsig++20 would need to be branched first, so you’ll need to make an EPEL request for that. (In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #1) > Can you please confirm whether you need > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cairomm or > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cairomm1.16 ? > > I could branch cairomm1.16 now; if cairomm is indeed what you need, then > libsig++20 would need to be branched first, so you’ll need to make an EPEL > request for that. Oh, I see, this is for gtkmm3.0. Then the dependency is on pkgconfig(cairomm-1.0), so cairomm is certainly the correct package, and you’ll need to request libsig++20. I’m happy to branch cairomm once there are no missing dependencies. Thanks. You mean libsigc++20 (with "c" in the middle), right? I requested that in another bug. I'll let you know once it's ready. (In reply to wojnilowicz from comment #3) > Thanks. You mean libsigc++20 (with "c" in the middle), right? I requested > that in another bug. I'll let you know once it's ready. Yes, thanks for catching the typo. Linking your request so I can find it later: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2315461#c8 Just for information, libsigc++20 is pending release at https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d035ccf798 FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7d954cfca7 (cairomm-1.14.5-10.el10_1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7d954cfca7 FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7d954cfca7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7d954cfca7 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-7d954cfca7 (cairomm-1.14.5-10.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |