Bug 237684

Summary:	%packages in anaconda-ks.cfg aren't right
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	David L. Parsley <parsley>
Component:	anaconda	Assignee:	Chris Lumens <clumens>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.0	CC:	daly, herrold
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-04-25 15:51:09 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	200431
Bug Blocks:

Description David L. Parsley 2007-04-24 19:10:28 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #200431 +++

See attached.

-- Additional comment from notting on 2006-07-27 13:13 EST --
Created an attachment (id=133178)
install.log


-- Additional comment from notting on 2006-07-27 13:14 EST --
Created an attachment (id=133179)
anaconda-ks.cfg


-- Additional comment from notting on 2006-07-27 13:25 EST --
I note also that 'repo' lines aren't written to anaconda-ks.cfg; in this case,
it was:

repo --name=extras-devel
--baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/development/i386/

Perhaps the use of an addtional repo is one reason the %packages is wrong?

-- Additional comment from daly on 2007-03-16 17:18 EST --
I can't believe this made it into RHEL 5 with all the hype.

This happened to me twice now on RHEL 5 installs.  One desktop and one server.

This is from my resulting kickstart:

%packages
@graphics

That's bad.  Not even @base is there!

Comment 1 David L. Parsley 2007-04-24 19:12:05 UTC

Wanted to be sure this bug was cloned to RHEL5.  This makes it a bit of a pain
for generating intial kickstart files.

Comment 2 Chris Lumens 2007-04-24 19:58:59 UTC

Does booting with updates=http://people.redhat.com/clumens/235881.img fix things?

Comment 3 David L. Parsley 2007-04-25 15:02:56 UTC

Yes, this corrects the issue for me.

Comment 4 Chris Lumens 2007-04-25 15:51:09 UTC

I have another bug that is tracking this issue and I think it has a high
likelihood of making it into the next update release of RHEL 5, so I'm going to
close this one out as NEXTRELEASE.