Bug 237836
| Summary: | .spec file uses undefined macro | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Florian La Roche <laroche> |
| Component: | uudeview | Assignee: | Adrian Reber <adrian> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | pertusus |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-05-05 12:41:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
While you're at it, since it (only) contains static libs, should be named *-static: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines?highlight=%28Packaging%29#head-82d97fc4a3421310f4e2971180e4165965b65662 I think that it should better be called uulib-devel and have a
Provides: uulib-static = %{version}-%{release}
It is how it is done in most cases. Since the devel is Provided it is
not a must, but I think that it should be done that way for
consistency.
Closing it again. uulib-devel/uulib-static has been fixed with a patch from Patrice. See #443649. |
Description of problem: [laroche@porky i386]$ rpm -qp --provides uulib-devel-0.5.20-11.i386.rpm uulib = {version}-11 uulib-devel = 0.5.20-11 [laroche@porky i386]$ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: