Bug 2379753
| Summary: | COPYING file is dead link | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | onkarshinde |
| Component: | mingw-glib2 | Assignee: | Kalev Lember <kalevlember> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 41 | CC: | fedora, kalevlember, manisandro, marcandre.lureau, rjones |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | mingw-glib2-2.84.3-2.fc42 mingw-glib2-2.82.5-2.fc41 | Doc Type: | --- |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-07-22 01:11:25 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
onkarshinde
2025-07-13 09:52:51 UTC
Same for mingw64-glib2: $ ll /usr/share/licenses/mingw64-glib2/COPYING lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 30 Jun 13 12:41 /usr/share/licenses/mingw64-glib2/COPYING -> LICENSES/LGPL-2.1-or-later.txt where the linked file also does not exist: $ cat /usr/share/licenses/mingw64-glib2/COPYING cat: /usr/share/licenses/mingw64-glib2/COPYING: No such file or directory Not sure what's going on here. COPYING is a regular file in the source archive, and the spec simply does %license COPYING I was trying to work out how the %license macro actually works, and it's not obvious! Seems to involve some RPM voodoo. I was just composing an email for the devel list ... FEDORA-2025-ed590ed184 (mingw-glib2-2.84.3-2.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-ed590ed184 FEDORA-2025-e2d840fa10 (mingw-glib2-2.82.5-2.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-e2d840fa10 Never mind, I thought I checked that the file was a regular file in the source archive, but I must have looked at the wrong source archive... The license tag in the spec file still doesn't reflect correct version. License : LGPL-2.0-or-later Shouldn't this be LGPL-2.1-or-later? FEDORA-2025-ed590ed184 has been pushed to the Fedora 42 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-ed590ed184` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-ed590ed184 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2025-e2d840fa10 has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-e2d840fa10` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-e2d840fa10 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2025-ed590ed184 (mingw-glib2-2.84.3-2.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2025-e2d840fa10 (mingw-glib2-2.82.5-2.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |