Bug 238192
Summary: | Update tomcat5 to 5.5.23 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Aaron Luchko <aaron> |
Component: | tomcat5 | Assignee: | Vivek Lakshmanan <viveklak> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 6 | CC: | christoph |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-01-05 12:17:31 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Aaron Luchko
2007-04-27 20:12:11 UTC
The problem is that upstream tomcat5 takes classes from a number of jakarta-commons-* jars (org.apache.commons package) and sticks it under the org.apache.tomcat package. JPP till before 5.5.20-6jpp was symlinking the appropriate jars from jakarta-commona-* jars from the appropriate packages without modification. These packages have since been modified to produce a -tomcat5 package that does the package translation for tomcat5 and symlinks jars produced by these. I will have to audit these packages to see if these can be updated to those expected by tomcat5-5.5.23-6jpp+. What about the security issues with Tomcat 5.5.17 (possible directory traversal attack if tomcat is running proxied behind another server, cf. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0327.html)? I can confirm the problematic behaviour on a Fedora 6 box. Is nobody worrying? RHEL released updates yesterday, but I did not find any clue about Fedora trying to update to 5.5.23, not a small notice. What is the current state? Bug #240208 has superseeded this one. The vulnerabilities are fixed with 5.5.23, the update was pushed long time ago. You may close this bug now, from my point of view. Thanks. Closing this bug. |