Bug 238484
Summary: | Graphical install hangs on AMD Geode LX 800 board | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Steve Magoun <smagoun> |
Component: | xorg-x11-drv-amd | Assignee: | Adam Jackson <ajax> |
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 8 | CC: | jimkaubisch, jonstanley, mcepl, triage, wtogami, xgl-maint |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | bzcl34nup | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-12-14 00:26:49 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Steve Magoun
2007-04-30 20:30:26 UTC
Fix version just tried to install the fc7 release version and it looks like this issue never got addressed. still comes up with vesa, still hangs. switching to amd allows system to come up but is *very* sluggish. Never had these problems under fc6 Steve, I am sorry, that we have let this bug rot for so long, but could you please confirm, that you don't get working X, when you remove /etc/X11/xorg.conf (probably just rename it to something in case it would be needed again) and just restart X without the one? Please attach to this bug uncompressed /var/log/Xorg.0.log both from your (vesa) configuration, as well as the one without /etc/X11/xorg.conf. I don't have access to that board anymore, sorry. Thanks for letting us know. Hang on, not so quick. I still have a board, and still need the bug fixed, as do others, I suspect. Please reopen. I'll try to do this in the next few days. The only question is the apparent circularity. If the machine is unusable after a graphical install, how do I install and then delete the file (given the screen is all screwed up)? Please advise Thanks Sorry, I misunderstood you. Reopening, of course. You can try to install in text mode (write linux text on the initial prompt of the installation process). Given the release of f8, I installed that on the machine in the hope that the problem had been fixed - no such luck. Hope the following helps. In the next few minutes I'll need to re-install fc6 on the machine used for this test. I won't have a replacement for some time. Using f8, tried what you suggested. Also tried a version of xorg.conf which runs fine on fc6. Unfortunately I have no easy way to get the log off the machine, but the last few lines of the log are consistent in all three cases: Note: The "//" on the 2nd line down is not a typing error (II) Loading sub module "int10" (II) Reloading /usr/lib/xorg/modules//libint10.so (II) VESA(0): initializing int10 (II) VESA(0): Primary V_BIOS segment is 0xc000 (II) VESA(0): VESA BIOS detected (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE Version 2.0 (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE Total Mem: 8192 kB (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE OEM: Advanced Micro Devices (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE OEM Software Rev: 1.0 (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE Vendor: Elpin Systems VGA BIOS (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE OEM Product: GEODE LX (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE OEM Product Rev: Version 6.12 (II) VESA(0): virtual address = 0xb7697000 physical address = 0xee000000, size 8388608 (II) VESA(0): VBESetVBEMode failedc000:0282: A2 ILLEGAL EXTENDED OPCODE! (EE) VESA(0): set VBE Mode Failed! Fatal server error: AddScreen/ScreenInit failed for driver 0 Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. Comment #8, which I submitted 5 months ago, clearly states that the problem exists under F8!!! I am unable to change the version to 8 so please, someone who can, please change it. Also, please, someone take responsibility for this. We're at the point where, stuck with FC5 because its the last version where this problem does NOT appear, we're going to have to switch away from Fedora! - Thanks I've changed the version to 8. ajax - is there something that can help you resolve this? This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping |