Bug 2385766

Summary: scalasca: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f43
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fedora Release Engineering <releng>
Component: scalascaAssignee: Dave Love <dave.love>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: dave.love, j.reuter, orion
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: scalasca-2.6.2-2.fc43 Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-08-01 01:01:22 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2339432    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2025-07-31 12:59:24 UTC 
scalasca failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f43

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=135427860


For details on the mass rebuild see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_43_Mass_Rebuild
Please fix scalasca at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
scalasca will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 44,
scalasca will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2025-07-31 12:59:30 UTC 
Created attachment 2102180 [details]
build.log

file build.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2025-07-31 12:59:35 UTC 
Created attachment 2102181 [details]
root.log

file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2025-07-31 12:59:38 UTC 
Created attachment 2102182 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Jan André Reuter 2025-07-31 13:06:45 UTC 
I'm guessing this is related to all the discussion on the Fedora Devel mailing list with regards to UCX (Thread: Help needed for scotch FTBFS: illegal instruction of ppc64le - gcc regression?)?
It would certainly make sense. We might need to figure out the exact failure, similar to the other failure on the mailing list.
Comment 5 Orion Poplawski 2025-08-01 01:01:22 UTC 
We've fixed this by disabling UCX in openmpi on ppc64le