Bug 2386223
| Summary: | DNF fails to update Slack repo due to now no longer existing CA file | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sebastian Keller <sebastian-keller> |
| Component: | dnf5 | Assignee: | rpm-software-management |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 43 | CC: | egoode, jonathan, pkratoch, ppisar, rpm-software-management |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | --- | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-08-07 20:53:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 2360110 | ||
|
Description
Sebastian Keller
2025-08-03 22:21:08 UTC
I don't think there is anything DNF should do here, unfortunately. Slack needs to update their repo file and not hardcode the path to this CA bundle. The `sslcacert` option should not have been set in the first place, IMO. I filed a similar bug report on Grafana [1] since their repo file also has this error, and I commented on the discussion thread for Changes/dropingOfCertPemFile [2] Looking at Slack specifically, I did not see a repo file in the latest Slack RPM package: `rpm -qlp ./slack-4.45.64-0.1.el8.x86_64.rpm | grep repo` yields no matches. And after installing the RPM, there is no `/etc/yum.repos.d/slack.repo`. Are you sure the repo file is provided by the RPM? [1] https://github.com/grafana/grafana/issues/109365 [2] https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-dropping-of-cert-pem-file-system-wide/135119/35 The repo file is generated by "/etc/cron.daily/slack" which is part of the rpm package. I think this way of adding repos is commonly found in chrome/electron based applications that ship their own rpm packages. Ah, I see, thanks. I sent a bug report via https://redhat-internal.slack.com/help/requests/new. |