Bug 2390166

Summary: Review Request: rust-glycin-common - Sandboxed image decoding
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fabio Valentini <decathorpe>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: blinxen <h-k-81>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: h-k-81, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: h-k-81: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://crates.io/crates/glycin-common
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-08-21 23:23:33 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2275913    

Description Fabio Valentini 2025-08-21 18:06:34 UTC
Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-glycin-common.spec
SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/rust-glycin-common-1.0.0~beta.1-1.fc42.src.rpm

Description:
Sandboxed image decoding.

Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe

Comment 1 Fabio Valentini 2025-08-21 18:07:04 UTC
koji scratch build for rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=136304955

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2025-08-21 18:09:46 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9455331
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2390166-rust-glycin-common/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09455331-rust-glycin-common/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 blinxen 2025-08-21 20:47:41 UTC
Taking this review.

===

Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review.

✅ package contains only permissible content
✅ bundled content is correctly declared
✅ package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
✅ test suite is run and all unit tests pass (doctests are skipped with valid explanation)
✅ latest version of the crate is packaged
✅ license matches upstream specification and is acceptable for Fedora
✅ license files are included with %license in %files (missing license files were added manually and upstream PR was made)
✅ package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

Comment 4 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2025-08-21 20:49:53 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-glycin-common

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2025-08-21 22:34:13 UTC
FEDORA-2025-4bc0001b39 (glycin-2.0~beta.2-1.fc44, rust-glycin-3.0.0~beta.1-1.fc44, and 2 more) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-4bc0001b39

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2025-08-21 22:34:41 UTC
FEDORA-2025-de85895bb4 (glycin-2.0~beta.2-1.fc43, rust-glycin-3.0.0~beta.1-1.fc43, and 2 more) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-de85895bb4

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2025-08-21 23:23:33 UTC
FEDORA-2025-4bc0001b39 (glycin-2.0~beta.2-1.fc44, rust-glycin-3.0.0~beta.1-1.fc44, and 2 more) has been pushed to the Fedora 44 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2025-08-21 23:26:29 UTC
FEDORA-2025-de85895bb4 (glycin-2.0~beta.2-1.fc43, rust-glycin-3.0.0~beta.1-1.fc43, and 2 more) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.