Bug 2390998
| Summary: | Please branch and build bear in epel10 and epel10.0 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | François Poirotte <francois.poirotte> |
| Component: | bear | Assignee: | Michel Lind <michel> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel10 | CC: | code, dan.cermak, epel-packagers-sig, michel, thofmann |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | --- | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
François Poirotte
2025-08-26 09:11:23 UTC
Since EPEL10.1 branching just happened, you’re probably asking for EPEL10, EPEL10.1, and EPEL10.0. I’m not interested in maintaining this in EPEL (I’m not the primary maintainer or an active co-maintainer of the bear package, and salimma is the EPEL bug assignee – weirdly, despite not being an official maintainer of the package), but I did a quick test and confirmed that "fedpkg --release epel10 mockbuild -- --postinstall" would succeed just fine using the current contents of the Rawhide branch, so I don’t see any real obstacles. |