Bug 2391237
| Summary: | Failing systemd units in systemd-based rawhide container | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jan Pazdziora <adelton> |
| Component: | systemd | Assignee: | systemd-maint |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | daan.j.demeyer, fedoraproject, lnykryn, msekleta, suraj.ghimire7, systemd-maint, yuwatana, zbyszek |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | --- | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-11-04 13:47:23 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jan Pazdziora
2025-08-27 08:07:02 UTC
Problem is still present with systemd-258-1.fc44.x86_64 in Fedora rawhide. The bug is now present on now-released Fedora 43 as well:
$ podman exec fedora-init-43 systemctl list-units --failed
UNIT LOAD ACTIVE SUB DESCRIPTION
● systemd-logind.service loaded failed failed User Login Management
● systemd-userdbd.service loaded failed failed User Database Manager
● systemd-logind-varlink.socket loaded failed failed User Login Management Varlink Socket
● systemd-userdbd.socket loaded failed failed User Database Manager Socket
Legend: LOAD → Reflects whether the unit definition was properly loaded.
ACTIVE → The high-level unit activation state, i.e. generalization of SUB.
SUB → The low-level unit activation state, values depend on unit type.
4 loaded units listed.
I might add that the issue is not present when this rootless systemd-based container is podman-run as --privileged. But that is obviously not a way we'd recommend users to run the containers, and it was not necessary for many years now. I'll close this as duplicate of the other one. Having all those bugs open is just confusing. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2391343 *** Are you sure that the root cause is the same and they are indeed the same issue? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2391235 *** |