Bug 239279
| Summary: | Review Request: libssh2 - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal <sindrepb> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | cweyl, lxtnow, matthias, mtasaka, opensource, ruben |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-10-07 08:41:49 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 201449, 239280 | ||
|
Description
Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal
2007-05-07 11:58:47 UTC
The man pages look to be more along the lines of developer documentation. Would they be better off in the -devel subpackage? Note needing to br pkgconfig directly is caused by a packaging bug in openssl. Filed at bug 241031. There appears to be an "example" directory as well. Would this make sense to include as %doc in -devel? Heh. I'm apparently doing this piecemeal.
Release is also off, it should be:
0.1.%{checkoutdate}%{?dist}
not
0.%{checkoutdate}.1%{?dist}
Updated - Fix release tag - Move manpages to -devel package - Add Examples dir to -devel package SPEC: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/libssh2.spec SRPM: http://folk.ntnu.no/sindrb/packages/green_nyc/libssh2-0.15-0.2.20070506.fc7.src.rpm I haven't been able to download Source0 from http://dl.sourceforge.net/libssh2/%{name}-%{version}-% {checkoutdate}.tar.gz The latest version there seems to be 0.14. ping ? Well, at that time, 0.15 wasn't out and the "%define checkoutdate 20070506" from the spec sort of shows it. But now 0.17 is out. Please update the package, then I'd be more than willing to perform a review. Use download.sourceforge.net here: Source0: http://dl.sourceforge.net/libssh2/%{name}-%{version}-%{checkoutdate}.tar.gz See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2 Is there any update or should I go with comment #4 package for review? IMO this review must be closed if no response from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK. There are some other packages submitted by Sindre with no response for a long time. I will also want to close bugs which are blocked by this bug if no response is gained within ONE WEEK. CLOSING. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please open a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new request. Thank you! Unfortunately, I don't have time to submit/maintain libssh2 properly at the moment... but I do have an updated spec/package for libssh2 out at: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/libssh2-0.17-1.fc7.src.rpm http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/libssh2.spec *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 398881 *** |