Bug 2393742
| Summary: | libheif.i686 prevents installation of openh264.x86_64 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sebastian Keller <sebastian-keller> |
| Component: | libheif | Assignee: | Neal Gompa <ngompa13> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 43 | CC: | decathorpe, dominik, multimedia-sig, ngompa13 |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | libheif-1.20.2-4.fc44 libheif-1.20.2-4.fc43 | Doc Type: | --- |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-09-09 21:23:00 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Sebastian Keller
2025-09-07 18:07:19 UTC
I wonder why this dependency isn't satisfied by noopenh264, which *is* included in i686 repos? Should these Conflicts be arched? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/noopenh264/blob/rawhide/f/noopenh264.spec#_17 The libopenh264 dependency for i686 is satisfied by noopenh264.i686, that's where the conflict with openh264.x86_64 comes from. Turning this into an architecture-specific conflict would probably be another way to avoid the issue. But then any attempts to actually use openh264 by libheif.i686 would still fail as long as there is no proper implementation of openh264 in i686. If there is none I think it would be better to disable support for openh264 in libheif.i686. FEDORA-2025-0e1202c234 (libheif-1.20.2-4.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-0e1202c234 FEDORA-2025-0e1202c234 (libheif-1.20.2-4.fc44) has been pushed to the Fedora 44 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2025-7e109c4976 (adwaita-icon-theme-49~rc-1.fc43, at-spi2-core-2.57.2-1.fc43, and 81 more) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-7e109c4976 FEDORA-2025-7e109c4976 has been pushed to the Fedora 43 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-7e109c4976` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-7e109c4976 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2025-7e109c4976 has been pushed to the Fedora 43 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-7e109c4976` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-7e109c4976 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2025-7e109c4976 (adwaita-icon-theme-49~rc-1.fc43, at-spi2-core-2.57.2-1.fc43, and 89 more) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |