Bug 2393777

Summary:	Please remove me from the gajim package in dist-git
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	gajim	Assignee:	Michael Kuhn <suraia>
Status:	CLOSED COMPLETED	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	45	CC:	epel-packagers-sig, lemenkov, mschmidt, suraia
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	---
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2026-08-24 10:28:17 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Robert Scheck 2025-09-07 21:57:02 UTC

Please remove me (FAS: robert) from the gajim package in dist-git (see: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gajim). I aimed for gajim in EPEL, but gajim's development doesn't seem to target LTS distributions and I also did not have success with my tickets at Red Hat for updating some libraries in RHEL.

I am currently listed in dist-git as default "Bugzilla Assignee" for EPEL and as collaborator. There are no gajim packages in any active EPEL branch.

Additionally, it could make sense to remove @epel-packagers-sig as well, because the group was emptied (see: https://pagure.io/epel/issue/345).

Thank you.

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2025-09-07 22:00:04 UTC

For python-nbxmpp (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-nbxmpp), it could make sense to remove @epel-packagers-sig at both places (bugzilla assignee, collaborator) as well, given it also was initiated by me (and you are the package maintainer in Fedora for both packages).

Comment 2 Aoife Moloney 2026-08-17 13:59:37 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 45 development cycle.
Changing version to 45.

Comment 3 Michael Kuhn 2026-08-24 10:28:17 UTC

Sorry for the late reply, I somehow missed this. I've just removed you and @epel-packagers-sig from both packages, as requested.