Bug 2396873

Summary:	ramalama: Please rebuild in Fedora 43
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Karolina Surma <ksurma>
Component:	ramalama	Assignee:	Stephen John Smoogen <smooge>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	43	CC:	dwalsh, go-sig, lsm5, mhroncok, smooge
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Reopened
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ramalama-0.12.3-1.fc43	Doc Type:	---
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2025-10-07 13:51:14 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2373702

Description Karolina Surma 2025-09-19 13:43:46 UTC

Dear package maintainer,

Due to reasons described in https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/O6LBYY446Q2FWVBEVJCOJ34ADXTEIH65/ a rebuild of ramalama is needed in Fedora 43.

During the mass rebuild, it was determined that rawhide and f43 branches differ, hence I did not know if I could safely merge rawhide into f43 or if the f43 branch needs a diverging bump.

Please, determine this yourself and rebuild the package in Fedora 43, ideally before the Fedora 43 Final freeze (2025-10-07).

Thank you. Let me know if you need help.

Comment 1 Lokesh Mandvekar 2025-09-19 15:42:44 UTC

The differing branches are because of Packit creating individual PRs for active branches https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ramalama/pull-requests?status=Merged . AFAICT, merging rawhide into f43 shouldn't be a problem as there are no actual code changes for the package between the two branches. I'll defer to Stephen though.

Comment 2 Stephen John Smoogen 2025-09-19 16:12:27 UTC

Correct there should be no problem. I just do not know what is involved with rebuilds when auto generated release numbers are done.. do I just make an empty commit and then start a build or is there some sort of exception needed?

Comment 3 Karolina Surma 2025-09-22 14:33:49 UTC

Yes, an empty commit is alright, we do:
$ git commit -am "Rebuilt for Python 3.14.0rc3 bytecode" --allow-empty

Comment 4 Karolina Surma 2025-09-29 14:22:56 UTC

Hello. This is a bulk comment.

This package still needs to be rebuilt and/or shipped with Python 3.14.0rc3+ bytecode in Fedora 43.

The Final Freeze of Fedora 43 is scheduled to start next week. Please prioritize this bugzilla accordingly.

Thanks.

Comment 5 Stephen John Smoogen 2025-09-29 15:14:46 UTC

Package has been rebuilt in https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2833137

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2025-09-29 15:42:41 UTC

FEDORA-2025-619c380538 (ramalama-0.12.3-1.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-619c380538

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2025-09-30 01:32:37 UTC

FEDORA-2025-619c380538 has been pushed to the Fedora 43 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2025-619c380538`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-619c380538

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2025-10-07 13:51:14 UTC

FEDORA-2025-619c380538 (ramalama-0.12.3-1.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.