Bug 239946
Summary: | May 12th, development tree boot.iso fails to retrieve minstg2.img or stage2.img | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jasper O. Hartline <jasperhartline> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | David Cantrell <dcantrell> |
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | triage |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | bzcl34nup | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-05-07 01:43:50 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jasper O. Hartline
2007-05-13 02:45:02 UTC
The alternate consoles show messages of the files being retrieved, but also say: "Reverse lookup of <server address> failed" "We don't have reverse lookups for IPv6 yet." I also disabled IPv6 during the setting up of the interface choosing just IPv4. I have done more testing, thanks for waiting. The only way I've been able to get anything done with this boot.iso is to actually rsync a May 12th updated tree to a local server and start an install over HTTP. This works, however.. more problems occur trying to use anything related to LVM in the text mode installer. I get either "Could not format partitions this is a fatal error press reboot to restart the machine" errors, and after that I formatted the LogVol00 partition myself and restarted the installation at which time I recieved a "Could not mount VolGroup00/LogVol00 as /: no such file or directory please press enter to reboot the machine" errors also. I am now attempting a VNC installation. I'll see how that plays out. Ok. I was able to perform an installation, I used the VNC method to obtain LVM functionality that worked, and I added 256MB of RAM to the machine to also not crawl through it. That is about all I could do on this machine to get an installation performed. If you need any information let me know. Well, this is stupid. When I had originally tried using the boot.iso I could have swore I put in 192.168.1.15/255.255.255.0 as prefix and IP address under manual configuration. I recieved an error and the error message led me to beleive instead of the prefix taking a 4 block octet it wanted just a single integer. So I typed in "1". Apparently this made the netmask 128.0.0.1 and that is why these problems were occuring. I think now that I may have made a typo in the prefix feild, and not understanding the error thinking that I typed in the prefix correctly, used a number which made the netmask wrong. Sorry about that! I will try to be less hasty next time, that keyboard is an older type keyboard with large keys that you literally have to bang on to get it to type without catching and not being depressed. Anyhow, you can close this.. thanks! What did you not understand about the error? I might be able to reword it a bit. Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. This bug has been in NEEDINFO for more than 30 days since feedback was first requested. As a result we are closing it. If you can reproduce this bug in the future against a maintained Fedora version please feel free to reopen it against that version. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp |