Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 2401174

Summary:	[GSS] [RGW]: segfault: (RGWRados::remove_objs_from_index(DoutPrefixProvider const*, RGWBucketInfo&, std::__cxx11::list<rgw_obj_index_key, std::allocator<rgw_obj_index_key> > const&)+0x10bd) [0x5617746101bd]
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Manny <mcaldeir>
Component:	RGW	Assignee:	Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Tejas <tchandra>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:	Rivka Pollack <rpollack>
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	7.1	CC:	bkunal, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, ckulal, mbenjamin, mikadmie, rpollack, tchandra, tserlin
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	9.0
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ceph-20.1.0-13	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	.`radosgw-admin` no longer crashes by non-positive values Previously, when running a `radosgw-admin bucket reshard` command, using a non-positive `--num-shards` value, such as a zero or a negative number, would cause `radosgw-admin` to crash. With this fix, the `--num-shards` value is checked an error message is emitted if a non-positive value is provided. As a result, `radosgw-admin` reshard commands run as expected, and are not able to create a crash.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	2404656 2405844 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2026-01-29 07:00:49 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2388233, 2404656, 2404655, 2405844

Comment 11 Michael Kadmiel 2025-10-22 08:24:23 UTC

hi,
Can i get a timeframe for the hotfix?
CU reached out.  I'd like to give him an estimation if possible.

Br
Michael

Comment 20 errata-xmlrpc 2026-01-29 07:00:49 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 9.0 Security and Enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1536