Bug 240129

Summary: system-config-users fails when explicit group is specified for new user
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Richard Ryniker <ryniker>
Component: system-config-usersAssignee: Nils Philippsen <nphilipp>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: tsui.tony
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 1.2.58 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-06-04 04:16:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Richard Ryniker 2007-05-15 13:01:36 UTC
Description of problem:
Cannot use explicit gid when creating new user with GUI tool.
Command-line tool "adduser" works without difficulty.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Version     : 1.2.56
Release     : 1.fc7

How reproducible:
Always.


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Invoke system-config-users as root.
2. Create new group with explicit gid.
3. Try to create new user with explicit gid (just created) and explicit uid.
  
Actual results:
[root@vista ryniker]# system-config-users
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/system-config-users/userWindow.py", line 289, in
on_userWin_ok_button_clicked
    if self.gidCheckButton.get_active ():
AttributeError: userWindow instance has no attribute 'gidCheckButton'
[root@vista ryniker]#

Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Nils Philippsen 2007-05-24 13:49:53 UTC
fixing version/component

Comment 2 Nils Philippsen 2007-05-24 14:10:24 UTC
system-config-users-1.2.58 is building right now which should fix this problem.

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2007-06-04 04:16:22 UTC
system-config-users-1.2.58-1.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 4 Nils Philippsen 2007-06-04 07:20:17 UTC
*** Bug 242224 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***