Bug 240361

Summary: Conga storage UI front-end is too slow rendering storage
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Ryan McCabe <rmccabe>
Component: congaAssignee: Ryan McCabe <rmccabe>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.0CC: cluster-maint, jmh, jparsons, kanderso, kupcevic, rkenna
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHSA-2007-0640 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-07 15:37:42 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ryan McCabe 2007-05-16 18:35:12 UTC
When a storage report request is made for a system, and that data is used to
render the storage pages, the front-end can take over 60 seconds to render
results that were retrieved in, on average, somewhere between between 3 and 8
seconds.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2007-05-21 22:23:53 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 2 Ryan McCabe 2007-06-04 18:06:43 UTC
I believe I've fixed the worst of this. There are probably some more tweaks that
can be made, but I've killed the major bottlenecks.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2007-11-07 15:37:42 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0640.html