Bug 240464

Summary: RFE: Need Cluster Centric Management of Storage
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Scott Crenshaw <crenshaw>
Component: congaAssignee: Jim Parsons <jparsons>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.0CC: bstevens, cluster-maint, rmccabe
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, Reopened
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-03-13 01:59:23 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 240463    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Rob Kenna 2007-05-17 17:50:57 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #240463 +++

Conga does a good job of configuring single and clustered storage from a
machine-centric view.

A cluster-centric view of storage needs to be presented.  By selecting a
cluster, instead of a machine, shared disk, partitions, LV, and GFS file systems
should be available.  For instance, you should not be able to change storage
seen only by specific machines and only gfs filesystems should be managed.  

In addition the creation of a new file system should apply across the entire
cluster, in the same way as the disk/partition/volume objects are.  This would
include mount points, fstab entries etc...
Comment 4 Ryan McCabe 2007-09-26 03:22:32 UTC 
*** Bug 303241 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Kiersten (Kerri) Anderson 2007-10-31 15:39:45 UTC 
Devel NAK for 5.2 - ended up below the line of available resources.
Comment 7 RHEL Program Management 2007-10-31 15:42:54 UTC 
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal
this decision by reopening this request.
Comment 9 Rob Kenna 2008-06-02 16:11:47 UTC 
NAK for Current Conga as we are working on a next generation infrastructure.
Comment 11 Ryan McCabe 2009-03-13 01:59:23 UTC 
retarget to the storage group