Bug 241059
Summary: | Cannot update wine-core for rawhide | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | James C. Bevier <jbev> |
Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dcantrell, mishu, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-05-23 21:35:35 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
James C. Bevier
2007-05-23 19:33:08 UTC
wine sub-packages are missing in the repo. Compare with: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=6165 i386, too How is it missing for i386? Does this mean we will need to explicitly whitelist *every* wine subpackage? That seems fraught with peril. Indeed. Do we even have support in mash yet to pull something that is purely i386 into the x86_64 repo? IE there is no x86_64 counterpart, it's all i386 all the time. It can be hacked, but I'd rather not have to track all the subpackages. Fedora Extras <= 6 had ['wine', 'wine-arts', 'wine-devel'] and its i386 dependencies in the x86_64 repositories. "wine" is a meta-package. i386 seems to be complete [now?] So what are you saying? I need to sync with you/somebody/magic if I drop/add suppackages +) As long as wine/wine-arts/wine-devel + depsolving DTRT, no. Should be fixed tomorrow. |