Bug 2413696
| Summary: | please branch and build pg_top for epel10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Filipe Rosset <rosset.filipe> |
| Component: | pg_top | Assignee: | Filipe Rosset <rosset.filipe> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel10 | CC: | mikel, rosset.filipe |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | pg_top-4.1.3-1.el10_2 pg_top-4.1.3-1.el10_1 | Doc Type: | --- |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-11-29 16:23:30 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2416030 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Filipe Rosset
2025-11-10 00:09:51 UTC
Please remove me as maintainer of all packages. I've made this request multiple times since I am no longer willing to contribute to Redhat packages due to their lack of full support for open source development. (In reply to Dave Johansen from comment #1) > Please remove me as maintainer of all packages. I've made this request > multiple times since I am no longer willing to contribute to Redhat packages > due to their lack of full support for open source development. hi Dave, thanks for your reply, you can try to add more maintainers / admins to the package or remove yourself from pg_top EPEL [1] meanwhile I opened rhbz#2416030 to move ahead with the "Non-responsive maintainer policy" [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pg_top [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2416030 [3] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/ Filipe, would you like to be added as maintainer of the package? I don't feel that using proven-packager rights for a maintained package without further discussion it's the best idea and I would like to avoid this scenario. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d2ee4dfc89 (pg_top-4.1.3-1.el10_2) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.2. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d2ee4dfc89 FEDORA-EPEL-2025-33cfb1fb84 (pg_top-4.1.3-1.el10_1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-33cfb1fb84 (In reply to Mikel Olasagasti Uranga from comment #3) > Filipe, would you like to be added as maintainer of the package? > > I don't feel that using proven-packager rights for a maintained package > without further discussion it's the best idea and I would like to avoid this > scenario. hi Mikel, either co-maintainer or next time I'll send PR to this package instead of commit directly in the past, this package was a bit abandoned, this is why I did some fixes over the years. btw thanks for the epel-10 builds and keeping the package in shape :-) FEDORA-EPEL-2025-33cfb1fb84 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-33cfb1fb84 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d2ee4dfc89 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.2 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d2ee4dfc89 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-d2ee4dfc89 (pg_top-4.1.3-1.el10_2) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.2 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-EPEL-2025-33cfb1fb84 (pg_top-4.1.3-1.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |