Bug 2414971

Summary:	Review Request: blocky - Fast and lightweight DNS proxy as ad-blocker for local network with many features
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Neel Chauhan <neel>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	NEW ---	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	loganjerry, package-review
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	---
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Neel Chauhan 2025-11-14 02:57:27 UTC

Spec URL: https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/blocky.spec
SRPM URL: https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/blocky-0.28.1-1.fc44.src.rpm
Source0:  https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/blocky-0.28.1.tar.gz
Source1:  https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/blocky-0.28.1-vendor.tar.bz2
Source2:  https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/go-vendor-tools.toml
Source3:  https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/blocky.service
Source4:  https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/blocky.sysutils
Source5:  https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/config.yml
Description: Fast and lightweight DNS proxy as ad-blocker for local network with many features
Fedora Account System Username: neelc

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-15 02:17:32 UTC

Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9800019
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2414971-blocky/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09800019-blocky/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- Documentation size is 21817311 bytes in 24 files. 
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Neel Chauhan 2025-11-26 16:56:03 UTC

The URLs should be:

Spec URL: https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/blocky.spec
SRPM URL: https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/blocky-0.28.1-1.fc44.src.rpm
Source0:  https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/blocky-0.28.1.tar.gz
Source1:  https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/blocky-0.28.1-vendor.tar.bz2
Source2:  https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/go-vendor-tools.toml
Source3:  https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/blocky.service
Source4:  https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/blocky.sysusers
Source5:  https://dump.neelc.org/fedora/packages/blocky/0/config.yml

Source4's URL had a typo for some reason.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-26 17:01:28 UTC

Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9839859
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2414971-blocky/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09839859-blocky/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- Documentation size is 21817311 bytes in 24 files. 
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 4 Jerry James 2025-12-19 02:18:27 UTC

We don't actually need the Source URLs.  Just provide the Spec URL and the SRPM URL.  But all of those URLs are returning HTTP 404 for me.  Are you still interested in having this package reviewed?