Bug 2416748

Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9832877
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2416748-silo/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09832877-Silo/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/silo
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Hi,

I will have a look at this one.

Regards

Phil

Hi,

This episode will be builds.

Builds
======

* Local x86_64: Fail

Snippet:

-4.12.0/tools/python/pysilo.cpp
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/Silo-4.12.0-build/Silo-4.12.0/src/silo/silo_private.h:64,
                 from /builddir/build/BUILD/Silo-4.12.0-build/Silo-4.12.0/tools/python/pydbfile.h:55,
                 from /builddir/build/BUILD/Silo-4.12.0-build/Silo-4.12.0/tools/python/pysilo.cpp:53:
/builddir/build/BUILD/Silo-4.12.0-build/Silo-4.12.0/redhat-linux-build/include/config.h:79:9: warning: ‘HAVE_INTTYPES_H’ redefined
   79 | #define HAVE_INTTYPES_H
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/python3.14/pyconfig.h:6,
                 from /usr/include/python3.14/Python.h:14,
                 from /builddir/build/BUILD/Silo-4.12.0-build/Silo-4.12.0/tools/python/pysilo.cpp:51:
/usr/include/python3.14/pyconfig-64.h:654:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
  654 | #define HAVE_INTTYPES_H 1
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/Silo-4.12.0-build/Silo-4.12.0/tools/python/pysilo.cpp:54:
/builddir/build/BUILD/Silo-4.12.0-build/Silo-4.12.0/tools/python/pysilo.cpp: In function ‘PyObject* PyInit_Silo()’:
/builddir/build/BUILD/Silo-4.12.0-build/Silo-4.12.0/tools/python/pysilo.h:85:13: error: either all initializer clauses should be designated or none of them should be
   85 |             .m_name = name,                     \
      |             ^
/builddir/build/BUILD/Silo-4.12.0-build/Silo-4.12.0/tools/python/pysilo.cpp:257:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘PY_SILO_MOD_DEF’
  257 |     PY_SILO_MOD_DEF(siloModule, "Silo", &SiloMethods[0]);
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

* COPR: Faill (all)

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/kathenas/generic-fedora-rawhide-all-with-review-not-production/build/10255189/

Regards

Phil

Hi,

Please remove the version depends with cmake. 3.12 has been long since superseded.

Regards

Phil

(In reply to Phil Wyett from comment #3)
> * COPR: Faill (all)
Fixed


(In reply to Phil Wyett from comment #4)
> Please remove the version depends with cmake. 3.12 has been long since
> superseded.
Fixed as well.

Updates here:

Spec URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/Silo.spec
SRPM URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/Silo-4.12.0-2.fc45.src.rpm
TaskID: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=144189437

Created attachment 2136389 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9832877 to 10304077

Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10304077
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2416748-silo/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10304077-Silo/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/silo
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Hi,

Sorry for the late reply. An infection in my foot has with the help of high dose antibiotics has helped to the point of decent concentration.

You are in the 'packager' group, so I would login to packages is source page below and 'Take' this orphaned package for at least fedora, but I would also hope EPEL.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/silo

Builds and checks of the spec file etc. look good.

Marking as '+' and many thanks for the great work.

This package may now have to pass through the retirement process, link below.

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/

Regards

Phil

The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Silo

The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Silo

FEDORA-2026-daad06faac (Silo-4.12.0-2.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-daad06faac

FEDORA-2026-daad06faac (Silo-4.12.0-2.fc45) has been pushed to the Fedora 45 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.