Bug 2417205

Summary: Review Request: python-coards - Parser for COARDS-compliant dates
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: code, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: AutomationTriaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://pypi.org/project/coards/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2417208    

Description Elliott Sales de Andrade 2025-11-26 03:34:17 UTC 
Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-coards/python-coards.spec
SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-coards/python-coards-1.0.5-1.fc44.src.rpm

Description:
This module is intended to help parse time values represented using the COARDS
convention.

Fedora Account System Username: qulogic
Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-26 03:37:27 UTC 
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9838549
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2417205-python-coards/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09838549-python-coards/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Comment 2 Ben Beasley 2025-12-01 08:00:09 UTC 
It looks like this is missing the license text for the stated MIT license, https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text, which is required. Ideally the text might be present in the upstream VCS (but that has gone away), or you might be able to get upstream to add a license file (but it looks like this project is unmaintained upstream). You might still have some success in contacting the upstream author to confirm the intended license text. If this fails, the guidelines linked above allow you to make a careful educated guess at the intended text.

I would also mention that you don’t need to pass the module/package name to %pyproject_check_import; it uses a modules list recorded by %pyproject_save_files.