Bug 2418959

Summary: [Lenovo] librdmacm licence files missing from filesystem
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mark Pearson <mpearson>
Component: rdma-coreAssignee: Kamal Heib <kheib>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 43CC: caznaranl, extras-qa, honggangli, jamacku, kdudka, kheib, kwizart, kzak, lnykryn, mschmidt, spotrh, than, xzhou, zbyszek
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 2418958
: 2418960 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-12-22 14:12:12 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Mark Pearson 2025-12-04 21:49:33 UTC 
Doing open source compliance review for Lenovo's Fedora 43 WS preload and found that librdmacm package does not have a licence in /usr/share/licences.

Looking at the spec file, it seems the licenses are all in the rdma-core package - which is not in the default install image.
Can the Licence file be added to the librdmacm part of the spec file please?

Let me know if there's anything I can help with

Thanks
Mark

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install Fedora 43 Workstation edition
2. Confirm librdmacm is installed by default
3. Confirm librdmacm is not under /usr/share/licences
Comment 1 Michal Schmidt 2025-12-21 18:48:17 UTC 
This was already fixed in bug 2315721, but only in Rawhide (rdma-core-59.0-3.fc44).
Comment 2 Mark Pearson 2025-12-22 14:12:12 UTC 
Ah - thanks. I thought I had covered this one before but didn't find the bug so created this one. Sorry for the noise.
Fingers crossed this shows up in F44.
I'll close this
Mark