Bug 2419369 (CVE-2025-14104)
| Summary: | CVE-2025-14104 util-linux: util-linux: Heap buffer overread in setpwnam() when processing 256-byte usernames | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Other] Security Response | Reporter: | OSIDB Bzimport <bzimport> |
| Component: | vulnerability | Assignee: | Product Security DevOps Team <prodsec-dev> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | unspecified | CC: | adudiak, crizzo, gtanzill, jbuscemi, jmitchel, kshier, kzak, slayericefire, stcannon, yguenane |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | --- | |
| Doc Text: |
A flaw was found in util-linux. This vulnerability allows a heap buffer overread when processing 256-byte usernames, specifically within the `setpwnam()` function, affecting SUID (Set User ID) login-utils utilities writing to the password database.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 2419370, 2419371 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
OSIDB Bzimport
2025-12-05 14:21:04 UTC
Fixed in upstream release v2.41.3, upgrade already available in f44 and f43. The bugfix was also backported into f42 (util-linux-2.40.4-8.fc42). The bug is in very old code (from 1997), so all older versions are affected. Status request: What is the timeline for backporting CVE-2025-14104 to CentOS Stream 9? Timeline data: - CVE disclosed: Dec 2024 (13 months ago) - Upstream fix: Available Dec 2024 - Fedora 43: Patched Dec 2024 - SUSE: Patched Jan 2026 - CentOS Stream 9: util-linux-2.37.4-21 (last update ~Feb 2025) This affects SUID utilities in multi-user environments. A 13-month delay for a moderate CVE with available upstream fixes seems unusual for a security-focused distribution. Is there a backport timeline or reason for the delay? |