Bug 2420493

Summary:	rebuild pam_script for RHEL10.1/Alma10.1
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Moritz Baumann <baumanmo>
Component:	pam_script	Assignee:	JT <jtfas90>
Status:	ASSIGNED ---	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel10	CC:	jtfas90
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	---
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Moritz Baumann 2025-12-09 12:45:48 UTC

Description of problem:
Please branch and build pam_scriptin epel10 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
dnf install https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-10.noarch.rpm
dnf install pam_script

Steps to Reproduce:
look at:
1. https://mirror.init7.net/fedora/epel/10/Everything/x86_64/Packages/p/
2. https://mirror.init7.net/fedora/epel/10.0/Everything/x86_64/Packages/p/
3. https://mirror.init7.net/fedora/epel/10.1/Everything/x86_64/Packages/p/

Actual results:

The package is in 1. but not in 2. or 3.

Expected results:

dnf install pam_script to work with the actual repo provides from epel-release 

Additional info:

epel.repo now lists:
#baseurl=https://mirror.init7.net/fedora/epel/$releasever${releasever_minor:+z}/Everything/$basearch/
#metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel${releasever_minor:+-z}-$releasever&arch=$basearch

so including minor version and not just major like it used to do.

Comment 1 JT 2025-12-13 19:32:42 UTC

I was just looking and I see the pam_script package in the epel10.2 path, https://mirror.init7.net/fedora/epel/10.2/Everything/x86_64/Packages/p/

Are you still unable to install the package?

JT

Comment 2 Moritz Baumann 2025-12-18 12:08:27 UTC

Well. Redhat and Alma and Rocky are on 10.1,

so:

metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel${releasever_minor:+-z}-debug-$releasever&arch=$basearch

from epel.repo does point to 10.1 and not to 10.2,

so no, unless I change the metalink I am not able to download this

Comment 3 JT 2025-12-22 00:54:25 UTC

Ah I see, sorry I misunderstood the issue. The 10.1 build has been made and an update via bodhi pushed. Thanks for your patience.

JT