Bug 242124

Summary:	[RHEL5.1][XEN][IA64] Fix HVM interrupts on IPF
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Keiichiro Tokunaga <ktokunag>
Component:	kernel-xen	Assignee:	Keiichiro Tokunaga <ktokunag>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Martin Jenner <mjenner>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	5.0	CC:	dzickus, lwang, mmatsuya, tyamamot, xen-maint
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	ia64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-09-20 19:42:19 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Keiichiro Tokunaga 2007-06-01 20:23:59 UTC

Description of problem:
Xen has changed to set-irq-level hypercall from shared-memory PIC stat.
IPF also needs to accomodate this.

cset#12441 fixes the issue.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2007-06-18 21:03:56 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2007-06-18 21:04:17 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Kernel Team for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release, and has moved to bugzilla 
status POST.

Comment 4 Don Zickus 2007-06-27 15:58:02 UTC

in 2.6.18-32.el5
You can download this test kernel from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5

Comment 6 Red Hat Bugzilla 2007-07-25 00:47:29 UTC

change QA contact

Comment 7 Mike Gahagan 2007-09-19 20:36:06 UTC

The patch mentioned at :
http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhkernel-list/2007-June/msg00843.html

is missing from the -45 kernel. Was there an alternate patch committed or was
this dropped intentionally?

Comment 8 Mike Gahagan 2007-09-19 20:40:37 UTC

It looks like the patch to fix bz242125 has pulled out the change mentioned in
comment 7.

Comment 10 Don Zickus 2007-09-19 21:37:04 UTC

I see the same thing.  Kei what happened here?

Comment 11 Keiichiro Tokunaga 2007-09-20 15:03:27 UTC

That was done intentionally.  I posted 20 other patches when I post the patch 
for this bug.  And one of them replaced this patch [6/21].

  http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhkernel-list/2007-
June/msg00847.html

Since we opened bugs for each cset of Xen upstream, we had to do the posting 
in such a confusable way...  (I understand it would be much better if we have 
combined the two for posting.)  Thank you for taking a careful look.

Comment 12 Keiichiro Tokunaga 2007-09-20 19:42:19 UTC

Talked with Brian.  As he sugguested, it would be more clear to treat this bug 
as a duplication of bz242125.  Closing this bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 242125 ***