Bug 2427018

Summary: Review Request: dtk6declarative - Deepin widget development toolkit based on QtQuick/QtQml
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Felix Wang <topazus>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://github.com/linuxdeepin/dtk6declarative
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9974111 to 9974112 none

Description Felix Wang 2026-01-04 16:01:52 UTC 
Spec URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/dtk6declarative.spec
SRPM URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/dtk6declarative-6.0.47-1.fc44.src.rpm
Description: Deepin widget development toolkit based on QtQuick/QtQml
Fedora Account System Username: topazus
Comment 1 Felix Wang 2026-01-04 16:16:43 UTC 
[fedora-review-service-build]
Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-04 16:19:50 UTC 
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9974055
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2427018-dtk6declarative/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09974055-dtk6declarative/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file copyright is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Documentation size is 6813622 bytes in 2 files. 
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-04 16:34:00 UTC 
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9974080
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2427018-dtk6declarative/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09974080-dtk6declarative/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file copyright is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Documentation size is 6813622 bytes in 2 files. 
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Comment 4 Felix Wang 2026-01-04 17:06:13 UTC 
Spec URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/dtk6declarative.spec
SRPM URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/dtk6declarative-6.0.47-1.fc44.src.rpm
Comment 5 Felix Wang 2026-01-04 17:10:10 UTC 
Spec URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/dtk6declarative.spec
SRPM URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/dtk6declarative-6.0.47-1.fc44.src.rpm
Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-04 17:22:35 UTC 
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9974111
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2427018-dtk6declarative/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09974111-dtk6declarative/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file copyright is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-04 17:28:47 UTC 
Created attachment 2121030 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9974111 to 9974112
Comment 8 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-04 17:28:50 UTC 
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9974112
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2427018-dtk6declarative/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09974112-dtk6declarative/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file copyright is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Comment 9 Felix Wang 2026-02-03 14:38:44 UTC 
Spec URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/dtk6declarative.spec
SRPM URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/dtk6declarative-6.7.32-1.fc44.src.rpm
Comment 10 Felix Wang 2026-02-06 15:54:45 UTC 
Spec URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/dtk6declarative.spec
SRPM URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/dtk6declarative-6.7.32-1.fc44.src.rpm
Comment 11 Felix Wang 2026-02-06 16:15:58 UTC 
[fedora-review-service-build]