Bug 2427950

Summary: Review Request: texlive-collection-bibtexextra - BibTeX additional styles
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Tom "spot" Callaway <spotrh>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Miroslav Suchý <msuchy>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: msuchy, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: msuchy: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://tug.org/texlive/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-02-07 13:55:22 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9987204 to 10001717 none

Description Tom "spot" Callaway 2026-01-08 15:29:32 UTC 
Spec URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-collection-bibtexextra.spec
SRPM URL: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-collection-bibtexextra-svn75480-2.fc44.src.rpm
Description: BibTeX additional styles Additional BibTeX styles and bibliography data(bases), notably including BibLaTeX.
Fedora Account System Username: spot

This package is a split out version of what used to be all mashed together in the "texlive" package. It is split out by "collection", which is an upstream TeXLive concept.
These packages are difficult to test in isolation, but they are all available in this copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/spot/texlive-2025
All of the components within this package are noarch, they do not need to be built, and they very rarely need to be patched. Accordingly, this package does not unpack all of the component files during %prep (this is the same behavior as current "texlive"), because it would require a large amount of files to be unnecessarily written to disk twice, slowing down the package build process by 2x. The package you're looking at might seem small, but some of these collections are pretty big. I would strongly prefer to have this package continue to work in that way, but if you feel strongly, you can plead your case here. :)
Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-08 16:35:29 UTC 
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9987204
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2427950-texlive-collection-bibtexextra/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09987204-texlive-collection-bibtexextra/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file COPYING is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/texlive-collection-bibtexextra/diff.txt
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Comment 2 Tom "spot" Callaway 2026-01-12 18:38:12 UTC 
Updated to latest component revisions, fixed descriptions, fixed licensing.

New SRPM: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-collection-bibtexextra-svn75480-3.fc44.src.rpm
New SPEC: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-collection-bibtexextra.spec
Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-12 19:58:35 UTC 
Created attachment 2121952 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9987204 to 10001717
Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-12 19:58:37 UTC 
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10001717
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2427950-texlive-collection-bibtexextra/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10001717-texlive-collection-bibtexextra/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file COPYING is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Comment 5 Miroslav Suchý 2026-01-15 09:09:55 UTC 
> LicenseRef-Knuth

Not a valid license. It's twice there.
Comment 6 Tom "spot" Callaway 2026-01-15 13:58:54 UTC 
Knuth license tags corrected, beebe updated:

New SRPM: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-collection-bibtexextra-svn75480-4.fc44.src.rpm
New SPEC: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-collection-bibtexextra.spec
Comment 7 Miroslav Suchý 2026-01-15 14:34:13 UTC 
[fedora-review-service-build]
Comment 8 Miroslav Suchý 2026-01-18 12:37:02 UTC 
APPROVED
Comment 9 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-01-22 15:54:41 UTC 
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/texlive-collection-bibtexextra