Bug 242866
Summary: | NULL pointer OOPS in plist_add on LS20 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise MRG | Reporter: | IBM Bug Proxy <bugproxy> |
Component: | realtime-kernel | Assignee: | Red Hat Real Time Maintenance <rt-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 1.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | -31 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-07-02 14:24:18 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
IBM Bug Proxy
2007-06-06 05:33:52 UTC
----- Additional Comments From dvhltc.com 2007-06-06 11:16 EDT ------- I believe the USB messages are BC KVM related. ----- Additional Comments From jstultz.com (prefers email at johnstul.com) 2007-06-07 18:26 EDT ------- At the very top of the original oops I noticed: RIP [<ffffffff81081787>] show_mem+0x8f/0x144 That looks alot like the sysrq-m bug (LTC bug #35225). I'm curious if this is fallout from that triggered by an OOM. Has this been reproduced yet? ------- Additional Comments From sripathi.com (prefers email at sripathik.com) 2007-06-08 02:08 EDT ------- (In reply to comment #8) > At the very top of the original oops I noticed: > RIP [<ffffffff81081787>] show_mem+0x8f/0x144 > > That looks alot like the sysrq-m bug (LTC bug #35225). I'm curious if this is > fallout from that triggered by an OOM. There were plenty of OOM messages in dmesg, so I think show_mem is related to that. ----- Additional Comments From ankigarg.com (prefers email at ankita.com) 2007-06-08 04:39 EDT -------
> Has this been reproduced yet?
John,
I have not been able to hit this issue. Been running our tests on some boxes.
Several possibly related fixes on the pile o' stuff Clark is pulling together now. ie, -rt10 + stable5 + misc fixes. Don't know the exact kernel version this will be labeled (its still building). How about you guys wait for that kernel and then see if this problem still occurs? ----- Additional Comments From cijurajan.com 2007-06-15 04:45 EDT ------- Just completed the release testing once again using 2.6.21-14ibm2 kernel. The problem didn't get reproduce. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From cijurajan.com 2007-06-15 08:16 EDT ------- Moving the state to NEEDINFO ----- Additional Comments From jstultz.com (prefers email at johnstul.com) 2007-06-25 19:56 EDT ------- Just as a sample point, I run multiple overnight runs of kernbench and recalibrate on an LS20 w/ -23ibm3 and -31 kernels and have seen no such problem. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |OPEN ------- Additional Comments From jstultz.com (prefers email at johnstul.com) 2007-07-02 14:35 EDT ------- This has not been reproduced for awhile. And its likely the showmem and softirq fixs that landed in -23ibm3 resolved this. Closing. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|UNREPRODUCIBLE | ------- Additional Comments From jstultz.com (prefers email at johnstul.com) 2007-07-03 13:10 EDT ------- Please do not move bugs from resolved states to closed. See https://ltc.linux.ibm.com/wiki/rt-linux/Bugs for the realtime bug lifecycle. |