Bug 2431343 (CVE-2025-59466)

Summary: CVE-2025-59466 nodejs: Nodejs denial of service
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: OSIDB Bzimport <bzimport>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Product Security DevOps Team <prodsec-dev>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: unspecifiedCC: caswilli, kaycoth, rhel-process-autobot, watson-tool-maintainers
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
A stack overflow flaw has been discovered in Node.js error handling where "Maximum call stack size exceeded" errors become uncatchable when `async_hooks.createHook()` is enabled. Instead of reaching `process.on('uncaughtException')`, the process terminates, making the crash unrecoverable. Applications that rely on `AsyncLocalStorage` (v22, v20) or `async_hooks.createHook()` (v24, v22, v20) become vulnerable to denial-of-service crashes triggered by deep recursion under specific conditions.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2431464, 2431465, 2431466, 2431467, 2431468, 2431469, 2431470    
Bug Blocks:    

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-01-20 21:02:10 UTC
We have identified a bug in Node.js error handling where "Maximum call stack size exceeded" errors become uncatchable when `async_hooks.createHook()` is enabled. Instead of reaching `process.on('uncaughtException')`, the process terminates, making the crash unrecoverable. Applications that rely on `AsyncLocalStorage` (v22, v20) or `async_hooks.createHook()` (v24, v22, v20) become vulnerable to denial-of-service crashes triggered by deep recursion under specific conditions.

Comment 2 errata-xmlrpc 2026-02-05 15:58:29 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

Via RHSA-2026:1843 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1843

Comment 3 errata-xmlrpc 2026-02-05 15:58:37 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

Via RHSA-2026:1842 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1842

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2026-02-10 12:44:52 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

Via RHSA-2026:2422 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2422

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2026-02-10 12:45:10 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

Via RHSA-2026:2421 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2421

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2026-02-10 12:45:41 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8

Via RHSA-2026:2420 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2420

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2026-02-17 09:25:16 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2026:2781 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2781

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2026-02-17 09:25:34 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2026:2783 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2783

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2026-02-17 09:26:15 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2026:2782 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:2782