Bug 2431513

Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10040993
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2431513-qbootctl/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10040993-qbootctl/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=141384411

updated `License:` field, and systemd unit

Spec URL: https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/packages/pocketblue/common/qbootctl.git/plain/qbootctl.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pocketblue/common/srpm-builds/10074569/qbootctl-0.2.2-1.src.rpm
koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=141662271

Created attachment 2126656 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10040993 to 10074614

Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10074614
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2431513-qbootctl/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10074614-qbootctl/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Package Review
==============

LGTM - thanks!

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "*No copyright* GNU General Public License, Version 2",
     "Unknown or generated", "Apache License 2.0 and/or GNU General Public
     License v3.0 or later", "BSD 3-Clause License and/or GNU General
     Public License v3.0 or later", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or
     later [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)]", "BSD 3-Clause
     License", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later". 4 files have
     unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /var/home/sam/tmp/review-qbootctl/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries
     with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: systemd_post is invoked in %post, systemd_preun in %preun, and
     systemd_postun in %postun for Systemd service files.
     Note: Systemd service file(s) in qbootctl
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[?]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: qbootctl-0.2.2-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm
          qbootctl-0.2.2-1.fc44.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmphn7zr0i3')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

qbootctl.src: E: spelling-error ('bootctrl', '%description -l en_US bootctrl -> bootstrap')
qbootctl.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('bootctrl', '%description -l en_US bootctrl -> bootstrap')
qbootctl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qbootctl
qbootctl.x86_64: W: no-documentation
qbootctl.spec: W: no-%check-section
qbootctl.src: E: description-line-too-long CLI tool for manipulating A/B slots on Android devices. It is a port of the original Android bootctrl HAL developed by
qbootctl.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long CLI tool for manipulating A/B slots on Android devices. It is a port of the original Android bootctrl HAL developed by
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings, 7 filtered, 4 badness; has taken 0.2 s 




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: qbootctl-debuginfo-0.2.2-1.fc44.x86_64.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpb2_y5pi6')]
checks: 32, packages: 1

 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 5 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s 





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
/bin/sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8): No such file or directory
/bin/sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8): No such file or directory
/bin/sh: warning: setlocale: LC_ALL: cannot change locale (en_US.UTF-8): No such file or directory
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 2

qbootctl.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('bootctrl', '%description -l en_US bootctrl -> bootstrap')
qbootctl.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qbootctl
qbootctl.x86_64: W: no-documentation
qbootctl.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long CLI tool for manipulating A/B slots on Android devices. It is a port of the original Android bootctrl HAL developed by
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings, 9 filtered, 2 badness; has taken 0.2 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/linux-msm/qbootctl/archive/0.2.2/qbootctl-0.2.2.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : e66b361f86fac413f6a96974b4045a1fbc385f9eb6cee7fa8a26e0ca77c74a51
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : e66b361f86fac413f6a96974b4045a1fbc385f9eb6cee7fa8a26e0ca77c74a51


Requires
--------
qbootctl (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /bin/sh
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
qbootctl:
    qbootctl
    qbootctl(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --name qbootctl
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, C/C++, Generic
Disabled plugins: fonts, Python, Haskell, R, Perl, Ocaml, SugarActivity, PHP, Java
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qbootctl

FEDORA-2026-ae776d6f03 (qbootctl-0.2.2-1.fc45) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 45.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-ae776d6f03

FEDORA-2026-ae776d6f03 (qbootctl-0.2.2-1.fc45) has been pushed to the Fedora 45 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.