Bug 2433163

Summary: Review Request: dxvk-nvapi-vkreflex-layer - NVIDIA Reflex Vulkan layer
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Simone Caronni <negativo17>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://github.com/jp7677/%{upstream_name}
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Simone Caronni 2026-01-27 07:25:06 UTC
Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/negativo17/dxvk-nvapi-vkreflex-layer/refs/heads/master/dxvk-nvapi-vkreflex-layer.spec
SRPM URL: https://negativo17.org/repos/multimedia/fedora-43/SRPMS/dxvk-nvapi-vkreflex-layer-0.9.1-2.fc43.src.rpm
Description:
This Vulkan layer intercepts Vulkan calls made by DXVK-NVAPI, enriches them with
extra data, and forwards to a Vulkan driver that supports VK_NV_low_latency2
device extension.

Setting up this layer enables the Vulkan flavor of NVIDIA Reflex.

Fedora Account System Username: slaanesh

Comment 1 Simone Caronni 2026-01-27 07:26:25 UTC
Pre-review here with the developers: https://github.com/jp7677/dxvk-nvapi/issues/342

Requires vkroots from updates-testing. Example: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-2c3b8dad9c

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2026-01-28 00:28:10 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10070531
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2433163-dxvk-nvapi-vkreflex-layer/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10070531-dxvk-nvapi-vkreflex-layer/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.