Bug 2436486

Summary: Upgrade to 5.2.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Mr. Beedell, Roke Julian Lockhart (RJLB) <8ru2u4gz>
Component: bugzillaAssignee: Emmanuel Seyman <emmanuel>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 43CC: astra, emmanuel, perl-devel
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: RFE, Upgrades
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/why-has-urm-not-created-an-rhbz-bug-to-track-accerciser-3-48-0/178990/3
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Mr. Beedell, Roke Julian Lockhart (RJLB) 2026-02-03 19:59:53 UTC 
Currently, Bugzilla is at:

> ~~~
> Name           : bugzilla
> Epoch          : 0
> Version        : 5.0.6
> Release        : 25.fc43
> Architecture   : noarch
> Download size  : 1.4 MiB
> Installed size : 5.6 MiB
> Source         : bugzilla-5.0.6-25.fc43.src.rpm
> Repository     : fedora
> ~~~

However, 5.2 exists.

# Reproducible

Always

# Steps to Reproduce

~~~sh
#!/usr/bin/env sh
run0 dnf5 install --refresh -y bugzilla
~~~

# Actual Results

`rpm -qi bugzilla` returns:

> ~~~
> Version : 5.0.6
> ~~~

# Expected Results

It should return ⪆:

> ~~~
> Version : 5.2
> ~~~

# Additional Information

As https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/why-has-urm-not-created-an-rhbz-bug-to-track-accerciser-3-48-0/178990/3 explains, enabling release monitoring may assist:

1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229163#c0

2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239786#c0

I care because of what https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/how-to-run-the-bugzilla-package/180539 describes.
Comment 1 Emmanuel Seyman 2026-02-06 16:26:12 UTC 
(In reply to Mr. Beedell, Roke Julian Lockhart (RJLB) from comment #0)
>
> However, 5.2 exists.


Back when 5.2 was released, there were issues with upgrading from version 5.0.x and I held off on upgrading the package. That said, if those issues aren't solved by now, I think we should bite the bullet and upgrade the package anyways.

OTOH, I don't really have time to maintain all my packages and I should probably orphan this package so that it can be picked up by someone who has more time than I do.

> As
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/why-has-urm-not-created-an-rhbz-bug-
> to-track-accerciser-3-48-0/178990/3 explains, enabling release monitoring
> may assist:

Historically, release monitoring has never worked well with software that has multiple active branches. Until it does, it's of little help, I believe.

> I care because of what
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/how-to-run-the-bugzilla-package/
> 180539 describes.

I will add my thoughts there.