Bug 244140

Summary: Guidelines for product version and naming.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Wade Mealing <wmealing>
Component: Installation_GuideAssignee: Don Domingo <ddomingo>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Michael Hideo <mhideo>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 4.5CC: i-kitayama, tao
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 5.0.0 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-02-01 01:18:45 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Wade Mealing 2007-06-14 03:47:25 UTC 
Description of problem:

With the invention of the Z stream (x.y.z) the product naming conventions have
changed.  Some of the documentation adheres to the old standard, and some the new.

I have customers asking about correct naming convention to be used, not only in
the documentation but also in the Release itself.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

RHEL 3
RHEL 4
RHEL 5
Comment 1 Don Domingo 2007-06-14 04:36:58 UTC 
putting this on queue for major doc revisions
Comment 3 Don Domingo 2008-02-01 01:18:45 UTC 
closed CURRENTRELEASE, as moving forward we've decided to use the x.y.z format
for versioning.