Bug 244650

Summary:	LVM should still capture signals when prompting the user
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Milan Broz <mbroz>
Component:	lvm2	Assignee:	Petr Rockai <prockai>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Corey Marthaler <cmarthal>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.0	CC:	agk, dwysocha, jbrassow, mbroz, prockai, pvrabec
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	RHBA-2007-0516	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-11-07 16:48:55 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Milan Broz 2007-06-18 11:43:56 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #180286 +++
RHEL5 clone

Description of problem:
I have 200 LVs and accidently tried to remove them without the "-f" flag. This
results in a prompt for every LV and I just have the time to type "y" 200 times.
Other cmds capture signals when prompting, so lvm should as well.

[root@link-08 tmp]# ls [tab]
Display all 161 possibilities? (y or n)
[Ctrl-C]
[root@link-08 tmp]#

[root@link-08 bin]# lvremove /dev/corey*
Do you really want to remove active logical volume "vol0"? [y/n]: y
[Ctrl-C]

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2007-06-19 16:44:36 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 4 Corey Marthaler 2007-06-27 21:25:38 UTC

fix verified in lvm2-2.02.26-1.el5.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2007-11-07 16:48:55 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0516.html