Bug 2448703 (CVE-2026-23255)

Summary: CVE-2026-23255 kernel: net: add proper RCU protection to /proc/net/ptype
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: OSIDB Bzimport <bzimport>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Product Security DevOps Team <prodsec-dev>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: unspecifiedCC: rhel-process-autobot, watson-tool-maintainers
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: ---
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2026-03-18 18:03:36 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: add proper RCU protection to /proc/net/ptype

Yin Fengwei reported an RCU stall in ptype_seq_show() and provided
a patch.

Real issue is that ptype_seq_next() and ptype_seq_show() violate
RCU rules.

ptype_seq_show() runs under rcu_read_lock(), and reads pt->dev
to get device name without any barrier.

At the same time, concurrent writers can remove a packet_type structure
(which is correctly freed after an RCU grace period) and clear pt->dev
without an RCU grace period.

Define ptype_iter_state to carry a dev pointer along seq_net_private:

struct ptype_iter_state {
	struct seq_net_private	p;
	struct net_device	*dev; // added in this patch
};

We need to record the device pointer in ptype_get_idx() and
ptype_seq_next() so that ptype_seq_show() is safe against
concurrent pt->dev changes.

We also need to add full RCU protection in ptype_seq_next().
(Missing READ_ONCE() when reading list.next values)

Many thanks to Dong Chenchen for providing a repro.