Bug 245016
Summary: | PolicyKit-gnome package review | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | David Zeuthen <davidz> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Matthias Clasen <mclasen> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, mclasen, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | mclasen:
fedora-review+
wtogami: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-07-31 19:54:58 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
David Zeuthen
2007-06-20 15:36:50 UTC
Preludes: - should use full source url - why do you need to BR both dbus-glib and dbus-glib-devel ? - might be worthwhile to drop the libgnomeui dependency Formal checklist: rpmlint: only warns about no docs in the -demo subpackage. I wonder if you want to include the sourcecode in the package, to make the demo actually useful for people looking for example code ? package name: follows tarball name, ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: - the source url was already mentioned - the %build section should also have a make, not just a configure license: ok license field: ok license file: ok, American English: yes legibility: excellent upstream sources: ok buildable: yes excludearch: n/a BRs: ok locale handling: n/a (LINGUAS is empty atm) shared libs: n/a relocatable: no directory ownership: - should /usr/share/PolicyKit and /usr/share/PolicyKit/policy be owned by PolicyKit itself ? file list duplicates: none permissions: ok %clean section: ok macro use: ok content: permissable documentation: ok %doc content: ok header files: n/a static libs: n/a pkgconfig files: n/a shared libs: n/a libtool archives: n/a desktop files: ok, I think. maybe you need to put a comment file ownership: ok %install: cleans build root filenames utf8: ok David did a new release and new srpms here: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/release-o-rama-july-2007/ Some comments still apply: - why do you need to BR both dbus-glib and dbus-glib-devel ? - might be worthwhile to drop the libgnomeui dependency But both are not blockers, so I'll say APPROVED New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PolicyKit-gnome Short Description: GNOME auth dialogs for PolicyKit Owners: davidz Branches: InitialCC: Built in pkg cvs. |