Bug 245441

Summary: please add %{arm} to pcmciautils's set of build archs
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh>
Component: pcmciautilsAssignee: Harald Hoyer <harald>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: pbrobinson
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: arm9   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-03-10 11:53:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 245418    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch for pcmciautils spec file. none

Description Lennert Buytenhek 2007-06-23 09:21:48 UTC 
The pcmciautils package works fine on ARM, but isn't currently built
on ARM.  Please considering applying the attached patch to add %{arm}
to pcmciautils's set of build archs.

Thanks for your time.
Comment 1 Lennert Buytenhek 2007-06-23 09:21:48 UTC 
Created attachment 157678 [details]
Patch for pcmciautils spec file.
Comment 2 Peter Robinson 2007-10-28 17:41:34 UTC 
Does this package actually need ExclusiveArch at all? Is there any Architectures
that this package wouldn't actually build on? According to the documentation of
the Fedora wiki here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures ExclusiveArch
shouldn't be used unless the package only works on particular Arch (like a boot
loader) and shouldn't use it otherwise so why can't the ExclusiveArch be removed
entirely and if there's any particular Arch that doesn't work add it as a
ExcludeArch instead.
Comment 3 Lennert Buytenhek 2008-03-10 11:53:39 UTC 
%{?arm} was added to pcmciautils's ExclusiveArch list in 014-10.